Question: What is your position on The 1877 Journey Community Forever Village that is in the process of being proposed on Barthold Rd/FM 1173? What key elements does the site on Barthold Rd/FM 1173 have that make it ideal for successfully starting and maintaining a community of this type? What would you say to the surrounding neighbors and neighborhoods who have been ignored by the non-profit and who do not want this development near their homes, schools, and businesses?
Click back to the questions list here.
Karen DeVINNEY
I’ve spent time with and listened to both sides, and no one wants this issue to turn into “a political football.” I’m aware that the one immediate neighbor opposes, but I’m not sure who the “surrounding neighborhoods” refers to, as the land is a mile from Krum and not near a school. All parties need to continue communicating to resolve what seem like minor differences.
The advantage of Community Forever is that the land is donated (free land!) and the community would be privately run, without funding from the city.
The disadvantage is that it is far from transportation and necessary services for the residents, who will be trying to get back on their feet after chronic homelessness.
Suzi RuMOHR
Any plan to end chronic homelessness must include housing. Denton has a temporary shelter, but that is not the same as a space someone can call their own. Our neighbors who are unhoused need a path toward housing stability and self-sufficiency.
When I first learned of the 1877 Journey Community Forever Village, I was disappointed by its car-dependent location far from city services or amenities. At the same time, I understand that this type of housing is likely to be opposed by neighbors in any proposed location.
Though I was initially skeptical of this proposal due to its remote location, I’ve since learned more about it and understand that it has many strengths. The land was donated for this purpose. The organization behind it has demonstrated an ability to fundraise for this project, which is critical for its long-term viability.
There is a deep need for this type of housing, and this project is the most realistic opportunity to provide it. To the neighbors nearby, I’d want to hear their concerns and identify options to address them.
Margie ELLIS
I believe we have more questions than answers right now.
First, for this development to move forward, a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zoning Change would be required. That would have to go through the public hearing process, which will be a good thing. As mentioned above, I am a proponent of community engagement when it comes to development. Public input is needed here. I have heard from some community members that the nonprofit has not been forthcoming with answers or a solid plan for this development. Those are answers we can seek through a public hearing process.
I also think it to be imperative that we talk to our neighbor, the city of Krum, as this site is at the entrance to their community. We need to hear their thoughts and concerns. After all, we would want the same consideration if we were in their position.